News That Matters

14/02/2024 ---- 05/03/2024

Former US President Donald Trump, in a notable turn of events, has made a triumphant return to the political stage, prevailing in his appeal against exclusion from the Republican primary in Colorado. This victory came on the eve of Super Tuesday when the US Supreme Court unanimously reversed a prior decision, thereby putting an end to efforts in Colorado, Illinois, Maine, and other states to block Trump from the ballot. This decision was a significant boost for Trump, who was previously barred due to a constitutional provision tied to the incitement of the January 6 Capitol attack in 2021.

The Supreme Court's ruling clarified that states do not have the authority to invoke a post-Civil War constitutional provision to keep presidential candidates off ballots, as this power lies with Congress. This verdict sets the stage for Trump's potential candidacy in the November election, with President Joe Biden likely to be the Democratic Party's nominee. Trump's political resurgence was further underscored by his victory in the South Carolina GOP presidential primary, where he defeated former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley. Despite facing criminal charges in four jurisdictions, Trump's victories indicate he could secure the necessary 1,215 delegates to clinch the nomination by mid-March.

However, Trump's political resurgence is marred by several legal challenges. A civil fraud case led to a ruling that Trump must pay over $350m in damages, a sum that could rise to around $450m with interest charges. This ruling also prohibits Trump from conducting business in the state for three years. While Trump denies the fraud allegations and is expected to appeal, the decision is on hold pending review by a higher court.

The financial implications of Trump's legal troubles are substantial, with the $354.9m penalty representing 14-17% of his wealth, according to Forbes Magazine. Trump also owes writer E Jean Carroll $83.3 million from a defamation case concluded in January, and he faces legal fees from four criminal cases at both the federal and state levels. These financial burdens could potentially exceed half a billion dollars, possibly surpassing Trump's available cash.

Despite these legal and financial challenges, Trump's political influence remains potent. His recent comments suggesting he would "encourage" Russia to attack any NATO member failing to meet its financial obligations to the Western military alliance have sparked controversy. His critical view of NATO as an excessive financial burden on the US has been met with strong opposition from the White House and NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg.

The road ahead for Trump is a complex one, marked by political victories, significant legal challenges, and controversial statements. As the political and legal saga continues to unfold, Trump's influence on American politics remains substantial. His journey will undoubtedly be closely monitored by both supporters and critics in the months to come.


On February 24, 2024, an incident almost led to a quarter of the world's internet and telecommunication capacity being lost. The mysterious severance of three undersea cables in the Red Sea resulted in a significant disruption to global data traffic. These cables, including the Asia-Africa-Europe 1, the Europe India Gateway, Seacom, and TGN-Gulf, are indispensable conduits, handling 17% of the world's internet traffic and over 90% of communications between Europe and Asia. Beyond this, they serve as unseen highways for global trade, with the Red Sea being a pivotal route for goods moving from Asia to Europe.

The timing of the cable damage raised eyebrows as it coincided with an escalation in attacks by Yemen's Houthi rebels in the Red Sea. Backed by Iran, these rebels had been targeting ships since November of the previous year, in retaliation against US-led airstrikes on their missile and drone launch sites. These airstrikes were carried out in response to over 30 Houthi attacks on international shipping in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden, which the rebels claimed were in support of the Palestinians in Gaza.

On March 2, 2024, the Belize-flagged vessel Rubymar became the first ship to be fully destroyed in the Houthi campaign, in response to Israel’s war against Hamas in the Gaza Strip. Despite over six weeks of U.S.-led airstrikes, the rebels continued their attacks, vowing to persist until Israel ceased its combat operations in Gaza.

The exact method used by the Houthis to target the undersea cables remains unclear, as they are not known to possess the necessary diving or salvage capabilities. However, it is possible that the cables were severed by anchors dropped from the ships disabled in the attacks.

The Houthi attacks have had a significant impact on global trade, compelling major shipping and oil companies to suspend transit through one of the world's most vital maritime trade routes. Many have chosen to avoid the Red Sea and Suez Canal due to the attacks, opting for the longer route around South Africa's Cape of Good Hope, adding approximately $1 million (€0.92 million) to costs.

In retaliation, the US and UK have conducted strikes on Houthi-held areas within Yemen. The US military has destroyed seven Houthi mobile anti-ship missiles being prepared for strikes. The operations received backing from Australia, Bahrain, Canada, Denmark, the Netherlands, and New Zealand, with the intention being to further undermine Houthi capabilities.

Despite the international response, the Houthis show no signs of relenting, continuing to threaten global trade, naval vessels, and civilian mariners. There are concerns that the Houthi attacks could escalate Israel’s war against Hamas into a broader regional conflict. The situation is further complicated by the Houthis' alliance with Iran, and with the assistance of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps and Lebanon's Hezbollah, the Houthis have amassed a formidable arsenal of missiles and drones.

In summary, the Red Sea crisis extends beyond a regional conflict, impacting global connectivity and trade. The undersea cables are vital arteries of our global society, and their protection is a matter of international security. The Red Sea crisis serves as a crucial reminder of the importance of these unseen highways in our interconnected world.


In the midst of Europe, the Visegrad Four (V4) - Poland, the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Slovakia - gathered in Prague to deliberate on the persistent Ukrainian conflict. These four nations, borne from the remnants of the Soviet Union and now part of the European Union and NATO, exhibit a clear division in their views on the conflict. Poland and the Czech Republic stand in solidarity with Ukraine, while Hungary and Slovakia, under populist leadership, harbor a more cautious stance.

Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk's labeling of Russian President Vladimir Putin as a "war criminal" and attributing the war to "Russian aggression" starkly contrasted with Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico's criticism of the West's approach and opposition to EU sanctions on Russia. Hungary's Prime Minister Viktor Orban, known for his close ties with Putin, delayed the latest EU aid package for Ukraine and advocated for peace talks. Despite these divergent views, all V4 nations concurred on not deploying their troops to Ukraine.

In another significant development, Hungary's parliament gave the green light to Sweden's NATO accession, ending a lengthy journey for Sweden. This move was well-received, despite initial delays due to objections from Hungary's ruling Fidesz party. However, the nomination of Tamas Sulyok as Hungary's next president sparked criticism and protests owing to his lack of political experience.

Belarus' President Alexander Lukashenko, who has been in power since 1994, plans to run for presidency again in 2025. This follows his controversial 2020 election victory, which incited widespread protests over alleged vote rigging. Despite a harsh government response to the protests and the shutting down of hundreds of independent media outlets, Lukashenko remains in power, largely due to support from Russia.

As the second anniversary of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine loomed, EU leaders, including Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen and leaders from Belgium, Italy, and Canada, visited Kyiv to express solidarity. However, the atmosphere in Kyiv was somber, as locals remembered the invasion's horrors. Amid these commemorations, both the EU and the US announced new sanctions against Russia.

Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, facing this ongoing conflict, called for weapons and funding at the Munich Security Conference. His speech underlined the necessity for international unity against Russia's aggression, warning of potential devastation of Ukraine, the Baltic States, and Poland. Despite the aid received, Zelenskyy's speech was noted as "more desperate" than the previous year, signaling a pressing need for immediate assistance.

In a tragic development, Alexei Navalny, President Vladimir Putin's most formidable opponent, died in a Russian penal colony. Following his death, over 100 people were detained in Russia for paying tribute to him. Navalny's death occurred just weeks before an election that will extend Putin's rule for another six years, a fact that has attracted international criticism.

This intricate political landscape reveals that alliances are being strained and the pursuit of power continues to dictate the fate of nations. As the world observes, the unfolding events in Eastern Europe serve as a stark reminder of the precarious balance of power and the ongoing fight for freedom and sovereignty.


The escalating crisis in Gaza, characterized by a mounting death toll of 29,400, has gripped the world's attention. Recent Israeli strikes in southern and central Gaza resulted in the loss of at least 48 lives, half of them women and children. The conflict has precipitated a severe humanitarian crisis, with the population on the brink of starvation, prompting European foreign ministers and US agencies to call for a ceasefire.

The enclave, home to 2.3 million people, is teetering on the edge. Over half of its inhabitants have sought refuge in Rafah, bordering Egypt, fleeing the violence and bombardment in the northern regions. Despite assurances from the Israeli government of evacuation before any attack, there are prevailing fears of a potential push to displace Palestinians into Egypt.

The International Court of Justice, the United Nations' highest court, has been hearing arguments on the legality of Israel’s policies in the occupied territories. The hearings, requested by the UN General Assembly for a non-binding advisory opinion, have been ongoing for four days, with China and Iran leading the discourse.

Efforts to broker a ceasefire are in progress, according to Benny Gantz, a member of Israel's War Cabinet. However, the situation remains volatile. Israel has threatened a ground offensive on Rafah during the upcoming Muslim holy month of Ramadan if the remaining Israeli hostages in Gaza are not released by Hamas.

In a separate incident, one Israeli was killed and at least five wounded when three gunmen opened fire near a checkpoint in the Israeli-occupied West Bank. The assailants exploited a traffic jam during rush hour, attacking several cars with automatic weapons. Two of the gunmen were killed by security forces, the third was apprehended after being wounded.

In the international sphere, the US vetoed a UN resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and proposed its own draft urging a temporary ceasefire. This unprecedented move by the US, described as a "significant shift" in American policy by former US special envoy for Middle East peace, Frank Lowenstein, was met with controversy. The Algerian-proposed resolution, supported by 13 of the 15-member body, was deemed by Washington to "jeopardize" talks to end the war. The US resolution calls for a temporary ceasefire "as soon as practicable" and on the condition that all hostages are released and barriers to aid reaching Gaza are lifted.

Despite international pressure, Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is determined to continue the war until all objectives are met. The potential ground offensive in Rafah, home to over a million displaced Palestinians, has sparked international concern. The UN has warned that such an operation could result in a "slaughter".

As the crisis continues, the International Court of Justice maintains its week-long hearings on the legal consequences of Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories, with fifty states set to address the judges. The World Health Organization has called for the evacuation of Gaza's second-largest hospital following an Israeli raid. International pressure on Israel is intensifying due to the potential threat the Rafah operation poses to hundreds of thousands of Gazans.

Negotiations for a ceasefire are ongoing, with no significant progress reported as of early Wednesday. The stakes are high and the situation precarious. The world hopes for a swift resolution to prevent further loss of life and suffering. For the people of Gaza, this conflict is more than a political dispute; it's a desperate plea for peace and a struggle for survival.


The global political landscape is in flux, underscored by Russian President Vladimir Putin's recent surprising endorsement of Joe Biden for the US presidency. This marks a significant shift from Putin's previous admiration for Donald Trump and his aversion to the Democratic party. Putin's comments, which highlight Biden's predictability and experience, come with the caveat that Russia is willing to cooperate with any US leader trusted by the American people.

Central to these geopolitical shifts is the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, a nation ensnared in the complex web of international power dynamics. Putin has expressed criticism over the current US administration's handling of the war, suggesting that adherence to certain agreements could have expedited its conclusion. He also voiced regret over not taking action in Ukraine prior to 2022 and expressed discontent with NATO's expansion.

NATO generals, on the other hand, are sounding the alarm about the heightened risk of war with Russia and are advocating for increased deterrence investment. These concerns are echoed by European leaders and military experts who point to ammunition shortages and outdated military equipment as significant challenges. Despite the European Union's pledge to deliver 1 million shells to Ukraine by March 2024, projections indicate only half will be delivered by the deadline, largely due to late underwriting guarantees from the German government.

The situation is further complicated by Ukraine's military struggles, including a 5-to-1 disadvantage in missile launches against Russia. This imbalance may eventually compel Ukraine to retreat from contested areas. The decision to increase weapon supply and boost European arms production now lies with European politicians, adding another layer of complexity to the situation.

Despite these challenges, Ukraine continues to resist Russian aggression, with successful defenses against multiple attacks by Russian forces and drone assaults on Kyiv. In the political sphere, anti-war politician Boris Nadezhdin is gaining traction in Russia, advocating for more domestic investment and less military spending. However, Putin is predicted to secure his position in the upcoming mid-March elections.

The United Nations' top court has also chimed in, ruling that Russia partially violated an anti-terrorism treaty by neglecting to investigate the funding of pro-Russian separatists in Ukraine. However, it did not hold Russia accountable for the downing of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 in 2014 or order compensation for victims.

Meanwhile, Ukraine continues to face Russian missile attacks on major cities, causing casualties and widespread property damage. The front line has been stagnant for months, with both sides resorting to trench and artillery warfare. The US, in response, plans to host an international support group for Ukraine in April 2022, but disagreements between Congress and the White House have stalled further aid beyond the $250 million package announced in December 2021.

In summary, the struggle in Ukraine is a microcosm of shifting global power dynamics. As the world watches, the stakes continue to rise, making the next moves of international powers all the more critical.


On February 16, 2024, in the remote and severe landscape of the Arctic Circle, Russia's prominent opposition leader Alexey Navalny tragically died. This event, deeply rooted in the complex maze of Russian politics and Navalny's contentious relationship with the Kremlin, has sent ripples across the international community.

Navalny, a persistent campaigner against corruption, was a significant irritant to the Russian establishment. His audacious critiques of the Kremlin and the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022 led to several prison sentences on charges ranging from embezzlement to extremism, all of which he and his supporters fervently denied. At the time of his death, Navalny was serving a 19-year term in the IK-3 penal colony, a brutal institution located roughly 1,900 km northeast of Moscow.

The details surrounding Navalny's death remain unclear. The Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia reported that he collapsed and lost consciousness following a walk, with resuscitation efforts proving unsuccessful. However, his mother, Lyudmila Navalnaya, asserted that Navalny was in good health when she last visited him on February 12, just four days prior to his death.

The international community reacted swiftly to the news of Navalny's death, with many leaders attributing responsibility to Russia. US Vice President Kamala Harris, addressing the Munich Security Conference, characterized his death as evidence of Russian President Vladimir Putin's harsh rule. Her sentiments were echoed by Secretary of State Antony Blinken and other global figures, including Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, and NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg.

In response to these international reactions, Navalny's wife, Yulia, urged for global action against Putin's regime. Conversely, Russian foreign ministry spokesperson, Maria Zakharova, accused the West of making claims without concrete evidence.

The repercussions of Navalny's death have been felt well beyond Russia's borders. It was a significant topic at the Munich Security Conference, where Harris reassured American allies about the future direction of US foreign policy. This followed former President Donald Trump's controversial statement suggesting Russia could act freely against any NATO member that didn't meet defense spending guidelines, a stance that Harris and President Joe Biden denounced as dangerous and destabilizing.

As the world grapples with the implications of Navalny's death, the focus now turns to Putin's regime. Navalny's voice continues to resonate, challenging the Kremlin and inspiring those brave enough to question authority. His death, shrouded in mystery and controversy, underscores the power struggles that define our world and the individuals who dare to defy the established order. As the world waits for the truth to emerge, the icy winds of the Arctic penal colony echo with the enduring legacy of Alexey Navalny.